USRC Stadium Home Dialysis

CCN

672809The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

May 4, 2017

Last certification

Aug 8, 2024

Overall star rating

5.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

US Renal Care Inc

Most recent change of ownership

Jul 1, 2020

Address

8181 N Stadium Drive, Suite 200
Houston, TX 77054
(713) 904-1756

• Usrc Houston Newco Home LLC

  dba US Renal Care Stadium Home Dialysis

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1891312559
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 9
  • State average 16.07 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 130 patients
• Adult patients with hypercalcaemia 0
  • State average 1.54 (computed here)
  • National average 1.74 (computed here)
  • 610 patients
• Adult peritoneal dialysis patients with adequate dialysis (Kt/V 1.7 or more) 95
  • State average 91.66 (computed here)
  • National average 91.7 (computed here)
  • 480 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected1.2
  • State average 1.04 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 290 patients
• Hospitalization rate As expected136
  • State average 155.26 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 480 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected1.36
  • State average 0.89 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 160 patients
• Mortality rate As expected21.3
  • State average 22.8 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,640 patients
• Overall star rating Better5 of 5
  • State average 2.87 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected82
  • State average 59.15 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 130 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant Better41.6
  • State average 15.33 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
  • 580 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 0
  • State average 0.46 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 110 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 18
  • State average 20.06 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 110 patients
• Readmission rate As expected10.6
  • State average 27.24 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 350 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected0.86
  • State average 1 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 210 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected0
  • State average 33.1 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 150 patients

• USRC Chinatown Home Dialysis
• USRC Gulfgate Kidney Center
• Usrc Houston Home Therapies
• USRC Premier
• USRC Sharpstown
• Usrc Webster Dialysis
• USRC West University Dialysis
• West Houston Dialysis Center
• Westminster Dialysis

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.