DaVita Jersey Village Dialysis

CCN

672781The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Jul 27, 2016

Last certification

Jul 12, 2016

Overall star rating

4.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Healthcare Partners Inc

Address

8787 Fallbrook Dr
Houston, TX 77064
(281) 477-7878

• Bothwell Dialysis LLC

  dba Jersey Village Dialysis

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1326440512
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 16
  • State average 16.07 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 710 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected1.43
  • State average 1.04 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 300 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 8
  • State average 2.63 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected98.6
  • State average 155.26 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 580 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected0.23
  • State average 0.89 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 380 patients
• Mortality rate As expected18.7
  • State average 22.8 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 2,280 patients
• Overall star rating Better4 of 5
  • State average 2.87 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected70.5
  • State average 59.15 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 710 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected24.6
  • State average 15.33 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 560 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 4
  • State average 0.46 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 230 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 0
  • State average 20.06 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 230 patients
• Readmission rate As expected20.3
  • State average 27.24 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 350 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio Worse1.84
  • State average 1 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • Worse than expected
  • 250 patients
• Standardized infection ratio As expected0.43
  • State average 0.33 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • As expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected0.42
  • State average 0.92 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 390 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected13.3
  • State average 33.1 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 230 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Ulka Mahesh Desai, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1841481025
• Tsegaw Erko Egziti, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1982995213
• Jonathan Daniel Pankow, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1962817783
• Mohamed Ali Sheta, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1457666570
• Ghayyath Sultan, M.D

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1780913996
• Colville T. Williams

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1861490005

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.