DaVita Round Rock Dialysis

CCN

672780The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Aug 4, 2016

Last certification

Jul 18, 2016

Overall star rating

4.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Healthcare Partners Inc

Address

1800 Round Rock Avenue, Ste 200
Round Rock, TX 78681
(512) 352-2549

• Hunts Dialysis LLC

  dba Round Rock Dialysis

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Round Rock, TX
  • NPI 1295130177
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 9
  • State average 16.07 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 540 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected2.09
  • State average 1.04 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 170 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 0
  • State average 2.63 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected153
  • State average 155.26 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 420 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected1.9
  • State average 0.89 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 200 patients
• Mortality rate As expected20.9
  • State average 22.8 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,560 patients
• Overall star rating Better4 of 5
  • State average 2.87 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected52.5
  • State average 59.15 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 540 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected16.1
  • State average 15.33 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 480 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 0
  • State average 0.46 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 110 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 18
  • State average 20.06 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 110 patients
• Readmission rate As expected14.4
  • State average 27.24 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 270 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected1.24
  • State average 1 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 180 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0
  • State average 0.33 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio Better2.52
  • State average 0.92 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
  • 300 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Javier Rodriguez-Sanchez, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Cedar Park, TX
  • NPI 1326489758

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.