DaVita Lake Jackson Dialysis

CCN

672500The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Nov 18, 2004

Last certification

Nov 10, 2016

Overall star rating

3.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Inc

Most recent change of ownership

Aug 1, 2014

Address

450 This Way, Suite a
Lake Jackson, TX 77566
(979) 299-6565

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 18
  • State average 16.07 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 1,300 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected1.24
  • State average 1.04 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 840 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 0
  • State average 2.63 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected170.4
  • State average 155.26 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,240 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected1.56
  • State average 0.89 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 560 patients
• Mortality rate As expected22.8
  • State average 22.8 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 4,550 patients
• Overall star rating As expected3 of 5
  • State average 2.87 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected57.6
  • State average 59.15 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,300 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected8.7
  • State average 15.33 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,060 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 5
  • State average 0.46 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 190 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 21
  • State average 20.06 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 190 patients
• Readmission rate As expected32.6
  • State average 27.24 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,210 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected1.14
  • State average 1 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 440 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0.11
  • State average 0.33 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected0.87
  • State average 0.92 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 790 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected9.9
  • State average 33.1 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 400 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Fabio G Aglieco, DO

  • Nephrology Physician
  • West Columbia, TX
  • NPI 1801031992
• Manaf A Alroumoh, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1548350614
• Naveed Shahid Anwar, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Abilene, TX
  • NPI 1497061931
• Elzbieta Janina Baranowska-Daca, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1154348142
• Ugochi A Osborn, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Pasadena, TX
  • NPI 1932442084

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.