DaVita Warner Center Dialysis

CCN

552835The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

May 21, 2018

Last certification

May 21, 2018

Overall star rating

3.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Inc

Address

21040 Califa Street, Suite a
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
(818) 715-9602

• Dale Dialysis LLC

  dba Warner Center Dialysis

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Woodland Hills, CA
  • NPI 1730558750
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 24
  • State average 17.89 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 930 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected0.86
  • State average 1.06 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 860 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 3
  • State average 4.97 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected106.9
  • State average 135.61 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 970 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected0.8
  • State average 0.9 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 360 patients
• Mortality rate As expected18.8
  • State average 21.34 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 3,890 patients
• Overall star rating As expected3 of 5
  • State average 3.35 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected62.7
  • State average 62.84 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 930 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected27.2
  • State average 24.4 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 830 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 0
  • State average 0.84 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 390 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 3
  • State average 18.16 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 390 patients
• Readmission rate As expected35.2
  • State average 27.72 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 480 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected1.07
  • State average 1.01 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 580 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0.12
  • State average 0.35 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected1.46
  • State average 0.69 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 510 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected3.6
  • State average 25.93 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 490 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Ramanath Dukkipati, M.D

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Northridge, CA
  • NPI 1457570376
• Sina Emami, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Encino, CA
  • NPI 1689954513
• Arian Gower, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Thousand Oaks, CA
  • NPI 1639531403
• Igor Kagan, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Los Angles, CA
  • NPI 1245674241
• Sohail Nasim, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • West Hills, CA
  • NPI 1174623920

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.