DaVita Tully Dialysis

CCN

552723The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Jul 26, 2013

Last certification

Apr 19, 2018

Overall star rating

4.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Inc

Address

614 Tully Road, Suite 30
San Jose, CA 95122
(408) 993-8959

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 29
  • State average 17.89 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 2,280 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected0.82
  • State average 1.06 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 870 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 1
  • State average 4.97 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected135.4
  • State average 135.61 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,620 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected1.17
  • State average 0.9 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 400 patients
• Mortality rate As expected16
  • State average 21.34 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 5,640 patients
• Overall star rating Better4 of 5
  • State average 3.35 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected54.8
  • State average 62.84 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 2,280 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant Better33.6
  • State average 24.4 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
  • 1,750 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 3
  • State average 0.84 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 340 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 12
  • State average 18.16 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 340 patients
• Readmission rate As expected27.2
  • State average 27.72 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,520 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected1.04
  • State average 1.01 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 550 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0.15
  • State average 0.35 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected0.28
  • State average 0.69 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 750 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected20.3
  • State average 25.93 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 480 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Zineb Benmayouf, MD

  • Hospitalist Physician
  • San Jose, CA
  • NPI 1730265257
• Maggie Chen, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • San Jose, CA
  • NPI 1649470683
• Alexander D Doan, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • San Jose, CA
  • NPI 1003859661
• George Lai, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Hayward, CA
  • NPI 1043398803
• Nhat Minh Pham, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • San Jose, CA
  • NPI 1568408763
• Deepa Ramaswamy, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • San Jose, CA
  • NPI 1427134931
• Phillip Foon Tse, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • San Jose, CA
  • NPI 1184732901
• Sheng-Yong Wang, M.D. & PH.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • San Jose, CA
  • NPI 1700813318

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.