DaVita Livermore Dialysis

CCN

552638The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Feb 3, 2010

Last certification

Jun 16, 2016

Overall star rating

5.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Healthcare Partners

Address

3201 Doolan Road, Suite 175
Livermore, CA 94551
(925) 245-9780

• Palomar Dialysis LLC

  dba Livermore Dialysis

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Livermore, CA
  • NPI 1700029642
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 11
  • State average 17.89 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 1,180 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected0.87
  • State average 1.06 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 520 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 2
  • State average 4.97 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected98.6
  • State average 135.61 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 980 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected2.21
  • State average 0.9 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 410 patients
• Mortality rate As expected18.2
  • State average 21.34 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 3,920 patients
• Overall star rating Better5 of 5
  • State average 3.35 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected71.8
  • State average 62.84 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,180 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected21.7
  • State average 24.4 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 680 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 0
  • State average 0.84 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 300 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 10
  • State average 18.16 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 300 patients
• Readmission rate As expected25
  • State average 27.72 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 690 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio Worse1.89
  • State average 1.01 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • Worse than expected
  • 430 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0
  • State average 0.35 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected0.44
  • State average 0.69 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 690 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected18.3
  • State average 25.93 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 380 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Deepika Kancherla, M.D

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Concord, CA
  • NPI 1790963726
• Peter Alan Lee, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Pleasanton, CA
  • NPI 1982857462
• Leena K Mehandru, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Pleasanton, CA
  • NPI 1427096452
• Rahul Rishi, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Castro Valley, CA
  • NPI 1740243930
• Anne Yu, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • San Leandro, CA
  • NPI 1114283314

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.