DaVita Ash Tree Dialysis

CCN

552563The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Aug 22, 2006

Last certification

Sep 27, 2018

Overall star rating

3.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Inc

Address

2666 N Grove Industrial Drive #106
Fresno, CA 93727
(559) 252-1932

• Total Renal Care Inc

  dba Ash Tree Dialysis

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Fresno, CA
  • NPI 1710939863
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 14
  • State average 17.89 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 2,250 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected0.66
  • State average 1.06 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,600 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 0
  • State average 4.97 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected165.3
  • State average 135.61 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,760 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected0.48
  • State average 0.9 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,340 patients
• Mortality rate Worse30.9
  • State average 21.34 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • Worse than expected
  • 7,240 patients
• Overall star rating As expected3 of 5
  • State average 3.35 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected64.3
  • State average 62.84 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 2,250 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected23.6
  • State average 24.4 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 2,280 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 3
  • State average 0.84 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 700 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 14
  • State average 18.16 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 700 patients
• Readmission rate As expected31.8
  • State average 27.72 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,740 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected1.33
  • State average 1.01 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,020 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0.34
  • State average 0.35 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected1.02
  • State average 0.69 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,580 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected29.4
  • State average 25.93 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 940 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Dominique Dorsainvil, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Fresno, CA
  • NPI 1902163413
• Glenn Donald Garbutt, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Fresno, CA
  • NPI 1063513737
• Mohammed Muhibbulla Siddiqui, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Madera, CA
  • NPI 1184916983
• Jasjit Singh, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Fresno, CA
  • NPI 1366744021
• Steve Wei-Shing Su, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Fresno, CA
  • NPI 1033187133
• Khin Su Yee, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Fresno, CA
  • NPI 1720377070

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.