462548-FMC-Cedar City

CCN

462548The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Sep 21, 2016

Last certification

Mar 2, 2021

Overall star rating

2.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Fresenius Medical Care

Address

1320 North Main St, Suite 105
Cedar City, UT 84721
(435) 867-8163

• Fresenius Medical Care Cedar City, LLC

  dba Fresenius Medical Care Cedar City

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Cedar City, UT
  • NPI 1093199135
  Name & address match

• Adult haemodialysis patients with adequate dialysis (Kt/V 1.2 or more) 97
  • State average 94.57 (computed here)
  • National average 96.13 (computed here)
  • 300 patients
• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 14
  • State average 19.1 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 320 patients
• Adult patients with hypercalcaemia 2
  • State average 3.06 (computed here)
  • National average 1.74 (computed here)
  • 420 patients
• Adult peritoneal dialysis patients with adequate dialysis (Kt/V 1.7 or more) 95
  • State average 91.08 (computed here)
  • National average 91.7 (computed here)
  • 130 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge Worse3.38
  • State average 1.45 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • Worse than expected
  • 180 patients
• Hospitalization rate As expected109.9
  • State average 110.24 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 400 patients
• Mortality rate As expected28.6
  • State average 21.09 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,240 patients
• Overall star rating Worse2 of 5
  • State average 3.29 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected69
  • State average 64.75 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 320 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected12.1
  • State average 13.23 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 360 patients
• Readmission rate As expected40.2
  • State average 20.68 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 260 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected1.44
  • State average 1.22 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 250 patients
• Standardized infection ratio As expected1.19
  • State average 0.56 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • As expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected2.23
  • State average 1.27 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 160 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected41.5
  • State average 22.88 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 210 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Marcellus Saka Assiago, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Riverton, UT
  • NPI 1235348897
• Carlos A Leon, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • St George, UT
  • NPI 1932131869
• Carlos Alberto Mercado, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • St George, UT
  • NPI 1366444051
• Andrew Michael Patchett, D.O.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • St George, UT
  • NPI 1235423518

• DaVita Iron Mission Dialysis

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.