DaVita Spring Dialysis

CCN

452787The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Oct 7, 1998

Last certification

Dec 6, 2016

Overall star rating

3.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Inc

Most recent change of ownership

Jul 1, 2005

Address

607 Timberdale Lane Suite 100
Houston, TX 77090
(281) 880-8287

• Total Renal Care Texas Limited Partnership

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1629022629
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 15
  • State average 16.07 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 850 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected0.62
  • State average 1.04 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 420 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 0
  • State average 2.63 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate Worse237.1
  • State average 155.26 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • Worse than expected
  • 830 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected0.7
  • State average 0.89 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 240 patients
• Mortality rate As expected21.5
  • State average 22.8 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 3,240 patients
• Overall star rating As expected3 of 5
  • State average 2.87 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected65.3
  • State average 59.15 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 850 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected17.9
  • State average 15.33 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 900 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 0
  • State average 0.46 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 210 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 10
  • State average 20.06 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 210 patients
• Readmission rate As expected29.1
  • State average 27.24 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 880 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected0.83
  • State average 1 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 380 patients
• Standardized infection ratio As expected0.89
  • State average 0.33 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • As expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected0
  • State average 0.92 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 300 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected28.3
  • State average 33.1 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 350 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Richard James Foley, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1083699383
• Gene David Forrester, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1558345116
• Sushmitha Gandra, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Langhorne, PA
  • NPI 1265643563
• Christopher Henry Kwoh, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Houston, TX
  • NPI 1962427534

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.