DaVita Victoria Dialysis Center

CCN

452658The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Sep 1, 1993

Last certification

Jan 4, 2018

Overall star rating

2.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Inc

Address

1405 Victoria Station
Victoria, TX 77901
(361) 576-9907

• Renal Treatment Centers-Southeast LP

  dba Victoria Dialysis Center

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Victoria, TX
  • NPI 1164486742
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 14
  • State average 16.07 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 1,170 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected1.24
  • State average 1.04 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 760 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 0
  • State average 2.63 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected172.1
  • State average 155.26 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,340 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected0
  • State average 0.89 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 410 patients
• Mortality rate As expected26
  • State average 22.8 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 5,700 patients
• Overall star rating Worse2 of 5
  • State average 2.87 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected56
  • State average 59.15 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,170 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected8.2
  • State average 15.33 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 960 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 3
  • State average 0.46 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 290 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 14
  • State average 20.06 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 290 patients
• Readmission rate Worse37.1
  • State average 27.24 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • Worse than expected
  • 1,520 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected1.13
  • State average 1 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 510 patients
• Standardized infection ratio As expected1.13
  • State average 0.33 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • As expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected0.44
  • State average 0.92 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 610 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected37.6
  • State average 33.1 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 430 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Yong Du, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Victoria, TX
  • NPI 1538153259
• Haresh Kumar, M.D

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Victoria, TX
  • NPI 1518087576
• Azhar Ali Malik, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Victoria, TX
  • NPI 1366436875
• George Amechi Osuchukwu, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Victoria, TX
  • NPI 1962612887

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.