South Texas Dialysis Center

CCN

452636The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Sep 18, 1991

Last certification

Jul 20, 2017

Overall star rating

3.0 of 5Care Compare

Address

1615 E Expressway 83
Mission, TX 78572
(956) 581-2136

• Bio-Medical Applications of Texas, Inc.

  dba South Texas Dialysis Center

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Mission, TX
  • NPI 1912019894
  Name & address match

• Adult haemodialysis patients with adequate dialysis (Kt/V 1.2 or more) 99
  • State average 96.1 (computed here)
  • National average 96.13 (computed here)
  • 1,220 patients
• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 16
  • State average 16.07 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 1,240 patients
• Adult patients with hypercalcaemia 1
  • State average 1.54 (computed here)
  • National average 1.74 (computed here)
  • 1,240 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected0.94
  • State average 1.04 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 440 patients
• Hospitalization rate As expected159.2
  • State average 155.26 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,070 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected1.08
  • State average 0.89 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 480 patients
• Mortality rate As expected16.5
  • State average 22.8 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 4,510 patients
• Overall star rating As expected3 of 5
  • State average 2.87 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected62
  • State average 59.15 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,240 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected9.6
  • State average 15.33 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 890 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 0
  • State average 0.46 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 190 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 26
  • State average 20.06 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 190 patients
• Readmission rate As expected34.7
  • State average 27.24 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,010 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected0.96
  • State average 1 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 270 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0.3
  • State average 0.33 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected1.44
  • State average 0.92 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 690 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected54.1
  • State average 33.1 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 240 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Salil Mangi, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • McAllen, TX
  • NPI 1881693695
• John Manllo Dieck, M.D.

  • Internal Medicine Physician
  • McAllen, TX
  • NPI 1578855680
• Roberto Manllo-Karim, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • McAllen, TX
  • NPI 1891794616
• Liliana E Rios Rojas, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • McAllen, TX
  • NPI 1598027930

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.