DaVita Faber Place Dialysis

CCN

422598The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Feb 9, 2005

Last certification

Mar 3, 2022

Overall star rating

3.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Inc

Most recent change of ownership

Oct 1, 2005

Address

3801 Faber Place Drive
N Charleston, SC 29405
(843) 767-8208

• Total Renal Care Inc

  dba Faber Place Dialysis

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • North Charleston, SC
  • NPI 1881656916
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 8
  • State average 12.52 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 530 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected1.56
  • State average 1.17 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 380 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 0
  • State average 1.22 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected143.7
  • State average 143.52 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 510 patients
• Mortality rate As expected16.6
  • State average 23.58 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 2,360 patients
• Overall star rating As expected3 of 5
  • State average 2.86 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected35.9
  • State average 50.06 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 530 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected23
  • State average 16 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 440 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 0
  • State average 0.46 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 170 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 0
  • State average 25.84 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 170 patients
• Readmission rate As expected23.3
  • State average 26.23 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 490 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected1.05
  • State average 1.1 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 210 patients
• Standardized infection ratio As expected0.93
  • State average 0.34 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • As expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected1.07
  • State average 1.21 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 300 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Bradley Scott Kalinsky, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • North Charleston, SC
  • NPI 1386818698
• Walton Strozier Moseley, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • North Charleston, SC
  • NPI 1194728311

• DaVita North Charleston Dialysis

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.