FMS Dialysis Services of Oxford

CCN

342647The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Mar 22, 2006

Last certification

Apr 17, 2025

Overall star rating

4.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Fresenius Kidney Care

Address

1620 Williamsboro Street
Oxford, NC 27565
(919) 693-7507

• Bio-Medical Applications of North Carolina, Inc.

  dba FMS Dialysis Services of Oxford

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Oxford, NC
  • NPI 1447287065
  Name & address match

• Adult haemodialysis patients with adequate dialysis (Kt/V 1.2 or more) 97
  • State average 97.51 (computed here)
  • National average 96.13 (computed here)
  • 820 patients
• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 19
  • State average 15.79 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 880 patients
• Adult patients with hypercalcaemia 0
  • State average 0.77 (computed here)
  • National average 1.74 (computed here)
  • 830 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected0.93
  • State average 1.15 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 300 patients
• Hospitalization rate As expected110.4
  • State average 130.06 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 790 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected0.89
  • State average 0.92 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 340 patients
• Mortality rate As expected15.5
  • State average 22.32 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 3,170 patients
• Overall star rating Better4 of 5
  • State average 3.19 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected60
  • State average 59.03 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 880 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected16.6
  • State average 16.69 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 590 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 0
  • State average 0.25 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 140 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 36
  • State average 23.23 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 140 patients
• Readmission rate As expected17
  • State average 25.59 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 600 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected0.7
  • State average 0.97 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 320 patients
• Standardized infection ratio As expected0.8
  • State average 0.4 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • As expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected0.57
  • State average 1.16 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 540 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected27.2
  • State average 30.88 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 220 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Charles Ian Cooperberg, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Durham, NC
  • NPI 1073530655
• Nawal Habib, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Durham, NC
  • NPI 1346692969
• Samuel Theodore Shaikewitz, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Durham, NC
  • NPI 1447276381

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.