FMS-Eastview

CCN

332585The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Aug 17, 1998

Last certification

Oct 28, 2022

Overall star rating

2.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc

Address

120 Victor Heights Parkway
Victor, NY 14564
(585) 742-1250

• New York Dialysis Services, Inc.

  dba Fresenius Medical Care Eastview

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Victor, NY
  • NPI 1891068409
  Name & address match

• Adult haemodialysis patients with adequate dialysis (Kt/V 1.2 or more) 98
  • State average 92.99 (computed here)
  • National average 96.13 (computed here)
  • 660 patients
• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 32
  • State average 20.16 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 720 patients
• Adult patients with hypercalcaemia 3
  • State average 3.07 (computed here)
  • National average 1.74 (computed here)
  • 680 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected0.63
  • State average 0.9 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 570 patients
• Hospitalization rate As expected107.3
  • State average 156.9 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 780 patients
• Mortality rate As expected23.7
  • State average 19.07 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 2,930 patients
• Overall star rating Worse2 of 5
  • State average 3.09 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected56.6
  • State average 62.43 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 720 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected24.2
  • State average 20.84 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 430 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 0
  • State average 0.95 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 170 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 6
  • State average 24.84 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 170 patients
• Readmission rate As expected21.3
  • State average 28.36 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 660 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected0.89
  • State average 0.81 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 340 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0.12
  • State average 0.36 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected1.1
  • State average 0.54 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 600 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected38.6
  • State average 33.67 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 250 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Syed Rizwan-Ali Bokhari, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Rochester, NY
  • NPI 1619324456
• Mohammed Rehmani, MD

  • Internal Medicine Physician
  • Clifton Springs, NY
  • NPI 1396840450
• Arjun Sekar, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Rochester, NY
  • NPI 1073877346
• Shubha Shastry, MD, PHD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Rochester, NY
  • NPI 1124387048
• Matthew Taylor, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Rochester, NY
  • NPI 1316324981

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.