DaVita Kansas City Renal Center

CCN

262564The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Feb 1, 1998

Last certification

Mar 10, 2025

Overall star rating

2.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Inc

Most recent change of ownership

Nov 1, 2006

Address

4601 Madison Avenue
Kansas City, MO 64112
(816) 756-0645

• Isd Renal Inc

  dba Kansas City Renal Center

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Kansas City, MO
  • NPI 1770539108
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 20
  • State average 20.15 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 1,150 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected1.12
  • State average 1.01 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 870 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 4
  • State average 4 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected166.5
  • State average 143.47 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,150 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected1.05
  • State average 1.22 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 400 patients
• Mortality rate As expected24.6
  • State average 21.54 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 4,210 patients
• Overall star rating Worse2 of 5
  • State average 2.59 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected50.2
  • State average 52.02 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,150 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected11.9
  • State average 15.55 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 970 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 0
  • State average 0.13 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 250 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 44
  • State average 20.36 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 250 patients
• Readmission rate As expected32.9
  • State average 28.29 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,360 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected1.28
  • State average 0.92 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 410 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0.2
  • State average 0.35 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected0.4
  • State average 1.5 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 270 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected45.9
  • State average 32.49 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 330 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Irme Akhtar, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Kansas City, MO
  • NPI 1083891535
• Ahmed M Awad, DO

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Kansas City, MO
  • NPI 1740245182
• Ryan Matthew Lustig I, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Kansas City, MO
  • NPI 1124246335
• Jignesh Shah, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Kansas City, MO
  • NPI 1871741751
• Susan Alexandria Woody, D.O.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Kansas City, MO
  • NPI 1053408484

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.