DaVita Los Angeles Downtown Dialysis

CCN

052828The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Apr 24, 1998

Last certification

Aug 29, 2018

Overall star rating

3.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Inc

Most recent change of ownership

Jan 1, 2000

Address

2021 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, CA 90007
(213) 745-4222

• Dva Renal Healthcare Inc

  dba Los Angeles Downtown Dialysis

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • NPI 1013981984
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 18
  • State average 17.89 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 1,580 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected0.53
  • State average 1.06 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 850 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 3
  • State average 4.97 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate Worse216.4
  • State average 135.61 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • Worse than expected
  • 860 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected0.44
  • State average 0.9 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 630 patients
• Mortality rate As expected23.3
  • State average 21.34 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 3,560 patients
• Overall star rating As expected3 of 5
  • State average 3.35 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected64.8
  • State average 62.84 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,580 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected9.9
  • State average 24.4 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,380 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 3
  • State average 0.84 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 380 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 16
  • State average 18.16 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 380 patients
• Readmission rate As expected23.1
  • State average 27.72 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 940 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected1.08
  • State average 1.01 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 490 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0.26
  • State average 0.35 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected0.86
  • State average 0.69 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 800 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected46.8
  • State average 25.93 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 450 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Myo Aung, M.D.

  • Specialist
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • NPI 1255366837
• Ying Hui Luu, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Santa Monica, CA
  • NPI 1922486893
• Ardavan Mashhadian, D.O.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • NPI 1003132523
• Tuan T Ngo, M.D.

  • Specialist
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • NPI 1134110208
• Igwe Ukoha, M.D.,

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Beverly Hills, CA
  • NPI 1679553291

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.