DaVita Chino Dialysis

CCN

052739The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Nov 10, 1993

Last certification

Nov 30, 2018

Overall star rating

4.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Inc

Address

4445 Riverside Drive
Chino, CA 91710
(909) 464-0347

• Dva Healthcare Renal Care Inc

  dba Chino Dialysis

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Chino, CA
  • NPI 1679547087
  Name & address match

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 15
  • State average 17.89 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 1,460 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected0.82
  • State average 1.06 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 380 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 0
  • State average 4.97 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected126.7
  • State average 135.61 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,110 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected1.15
  • State average 0.9 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 390 patients
• Mortality rate As expected17.6
  • State average 21.34 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 4,160 patients
• Overall star rating Better4 of 5
  • State average 3.35 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected67.3
  • State average 62.84 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,460 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected19.6
  • State average 24.4 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,030 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 4
  • State average 0.84 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 260 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 4
  • State average 18.16 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 260 patients
• Readmission rate As expected21.7
  • State average 27.72 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 830 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected0.96
  • State average 1.01 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 290 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0.2
  • State average 0.35 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected1.63
  • State average 0.69 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 680 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected6.2
  • State average 25.93 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 260 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Jonardi Handoko, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Upland, CA
  • NPI 1780664581
• Hla Myint Maung Shin Jian Hwang, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Ontario, CA
  • NPI 1356357560
• Saman Sarani, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Upland, CA
  • NPI 1124333141
• Jin Wang, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Upland, CA
  • NPI 1154353126

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.