DaVita Eaton Canyon Dialysis

CCN

052613The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Active

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Feb 20, 1985

Last certification

Jul 13, 2018

Overall star rating

2.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Davita Healthcare Parthers, Inc

Most recent change of ownership

Jun 30, 2018

Address

2551 E Washington Blvd
Pasadena, CA 91107
(818) 798-8896

• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 15
  • State average 17.89 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 960 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected1.27
  • State average 1.06 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 880 patients
• Health care personnel up to date with COVID-19 vaccination 4
  • State average 4.97 (computed here)
  • National average 3.99 (computed here)
• Hospitalization rate As expected157.2
  • State average 135.61 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 970 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected0.42
  • State average 0.9 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 270 patients
• Mortality rate As expected22.1
  • State average 21.34 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 3,710 patients
• Overall star rating Worse2 of 5
  • State average 3.35 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected66.1
  • State average 62.84 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 960 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected16
  • State average 24.4 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 830 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin above 12 g/dL 0
  • State average 0.84 (computed here)
  • National average 0.55 (computed here)
  • 300 patients
• Patients with haemoglobin below 10 g/dL 20
  • State average 18.16 (computed here)
  • National average 20.95 (computed here)
  • 300 patients
• Readmission rate As expected33.2
  • State average 27.72 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 950 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected1.05
  • State average 1.01 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 500 patients
• Standardized infection ratio Better0.21
  • State average 0.35 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • Better than expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected0.21
  • State average 0.69 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 440 patients
• Transfusion rate As expected27
  • State average 25.93 (computed here)
  • National average 30.12 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 410 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Sevag Balikian, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Pasadena, CA
  • NPI 1346485315
• Justin Alexander Chen, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Pasadena, CA
  • NPI 1447526066
• Matthew Kim, DO

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Pasadena, CA
  • NPI 1700319837
• Nirmal Kumar, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Pasadena, CA
  • NPI 1578652111
• Ilian Orlando Marquez, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Pasadena, CA
  • NPI 1710019906
• Ann Moore, MD

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Pasadena, CA
  • NPI 1750506630
• Ashok Sunder Raj, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Pasadena, CA
  • NPI 1093744070
• Ka-Lok E. Tse, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Pasadena, CA
  • NPI 1093730491

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.