032654-Fresenius Kidney Care Canyon Vista

CCN

032654The number CMS certifies the facility under, not a provider identifier

Status

Terminated Voluntary: merger or closure, May 1, 2026

Provider type

End-stage renal disease facility

Ownership

Profit

Control type

For Profit

Participating since

Aug 1, 2019

Last certification

Jun 15, 2022

Overall star rating

3.0 of 5Care Compare

Multi-facility organization

Fresenius Medical Care

Address

5555 Mesa Verde Drive, Suite 120
Sierra Vista, AZ 85635
(520) 458-4490

• Bio-Medical Applications of Arizona, LLC

  dba Fresenius Kidney Care Canyon Vista

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Clinic/Center
  • Sierra Vista, AZ
  • NPI 1508370404
  Name & address match

• Adult haemodialysis patients with adequate dialysis (Kt/V 1.2 or more) 99
  • State average 97.42 (computed here)
  • National average 96.13 (computed here)
  • 370 patients
• Adult patients dialysed through a long-term catheter 15
  • State average 16.11 (computed here)
  • National average 18.87 (computed here)
  • 410 patients
• Adult patients with hypercalcaemia 0
  • State average 0.99 (computed here)
  • National average 1.74 (computed here)
  • 370 patients
• Emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge As expected0.92
  • State average 1.04 (computed here)
  • National average 1.06 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 260 patients
• Hospitalization rate As expected114.1
  • State average 142.03 (computed here)
  • National average 144.53 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 280 patients
• Kidney transplant waitlist ratio, first year As expected0.48
  • State average 0.69 (computed here)
  • National average 0.98 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 210 patients
• Mortality rate As expected18.2
  • State average 22.42 (computed here)
  • National average 21.79 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 1,050 patients
• Overall star rating As expected3 of 5
  • State average 2.83 (computed here)
  • National average 2.87 (computed here)
• Patients treated through an arteriovenous fistula As expected62
  • State average 64.06 (computed here)
  • National average 57.13 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 410 patients
• Patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant As expected15.4
  • State average 10.47 (computed here)
  • National average 16.51 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 310 patients
• Readmission rate As expected15.9
  • State average 27.51 (computed here)
  • National average 26.95 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 180 patients
• Standardized emergency department visit ratio As expected0.91
  • State average 0.95 (computed here)
  • National average 1 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 120 patients
• Standardized infection ratio As expected0
  • State average 0.25 (computed here)
  • National average 0.36 (computed here)
  • As expected
• Standardized modality switch ratio As expected0.3
  • State average 0.88 (computed here)
  • National average 1.09 (computed here)
  • As expected
  • 320 patients

Clinicians who list this facility as a hospital or facility affiliation in Care Compare.

• Michael J. Delong, M.D.

  • Nephrology Physician
  • Tucson, AZ
  • NPI 1912928201

• DaVita Sierra Vista Dialysis

• Provider of Services: the certification, provider type, beds and status.
• Medicare Care Compare: the star rating and every measure on this page, with the state and national rates CMS publishes beside them, and the clinicians who list this facility as an affiliation.
• NPPES NPI Registry: the NPI records connected to this certification and the names of the providers listed above.

Better and worse are CMS's own comparison with the national rate, not ours: for most measures a low score is the good one (deaths, infections) and for others a high one is, so measures where CMS states no comparison are left uncoloured. The exception is star ratings, which are read against the national average here. Quality measures are published by CMS and are not adjusted or re-scored here. Averages marked “computed here” are the mean of every facility reporting that measure, worked out by NPIMap because CMS publishes no comparison for it. Confirm anything you rely on at Medicare Care Compare.